These provisions apply to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even though the transaction occurred before its promulgation. Read more
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by law." It is actually nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents from the boy or Female do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they will do if they might cut off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as such they were perfectly mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Generally speaking, higher courts do not have direct oversight over the lessen courts of record, in that they cannot arrive at out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of the lessen courts.
PLR is often a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
We've been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of regulation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed because of the Constitution and laws of your United States and this State.
The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case experienced the boy read more made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report to the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Article 27 of your Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment likewise. The disparity within the shell out scale allowances of Stenographers during the District Judiciary is in the very clear negation of your legislation laid down with the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. When the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she can then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety times with the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
10. Based within the findings of your inquiry committee, this petition is not regarded maintainable and is also therefore liable for being dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
Given that the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but can be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.